New take.

It's not marketing.

The private american companies are scaremongering to get ai regulated. Why? Because their Chinese competition is open source.

They are scaremongering that ai is dangerous and existential and needs shut down switches and the like. They want this despite it being a pain in the ass for themselves because it will force all open source ai into legal problems that closed source ai in private companies will not have because of "kill switches" and the like.

They are losing to Chinese open source ai and want to weaponise fear into regulation against open source.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 13 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

I think the issue is specifically because the Chinese ai is open source.

The western private ai can not compete with open source ai, there is no business model where they can win.

The only option they have is to get it regulated out of the market and the only way to do that is to kick up fear that ai is dangerous and needs to be given strict safety measures to prevent it from breaking containment and going wild.

There's no way to contain open source, so open source ai will have to be restricted.

This was like a lightbulb "Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh" moment for me when I realised it was about private closed source vs open source. You can restrict "safety" for the private one but you can't make what random people do with open source safe so you just have to shut it down. That's where they're planning to go with this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago

    Yeah this is true. Before I was combining it, thinking that right now Anthropic and OpenAI are seeing enterprise fly directly into the arms of DeepSeek/moonshot etc as soon as they tried to nudge the usage costs slightly towards the actual costs of serving the tokens.

    But your point is probably more relevant—open source is mostly spinning up right now, hobbyists, maybe some small businesses playing—probably some major corps using it a bit, but each month that passes, this is gonna escalate and escalate. Why pay insane token and subscription costs and potentially forfeit all your proprietary corporate data to tech cloud when you could instead invest in a modest gpu cluster that you own and control, and then spin up a model that hits 95% of ability of the so called “frontier” for your use cases? You get to keep everything internal, you can train it towards your processes, you can work on stripping out the refusals, etc etc. this will absolutely be the no-brainer choice for actual enterprise. If the open source models start hitting mainstream-obvious parity or exceeding the closed frontier models (something that is not hard to imagine, they’re already crazy more efficient than the closed ones now), then the closed ai providers are completely done.

    And so since closed frontier labs are staring at their own self-inflicted financial suicide, combined with external competition that make their entire product essentially obsolete in short time if they hit their marks; they will instead try to get banned via controlled politicians.

    I could imaging that other aspects of capital might act as a counter here, because the incentives for them are going to be pretty heavily weighted against the closed labs holding them hostage forever, but also the economy is pretty much only growing on data center capex and some healthcare, so maybe they temper their resistance because of worries that wider economic crash would also sink them as well…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The entire trade standoff with China also backfires because the endgame is worse treats.

    In 2040, you'll look in Havana, Hanoi, or Hamburg, and they'll have nifty electric cars, solar panels, and have figured out the three trifling tasks AI actually improves once the hype bubble deflates.

    Meanwhile, Detroit will be selling a SUV that gets three miles to the gallon and Claude will still be passionately sycophanting to a captive market who can just stare longingly at the rest of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 14 points 1 day ago

    selling a SUV

    Renting. They want every single thing to be subscription. The end point of capitalism is to turn all personal property into private property that they rent back to us.

  • source
  • parent