you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

...approved? You've got to be fucking joking. If your protest is "approved" by the corrupt government you're protesting, then you might as well stay home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I obviously don't disagree. I don't think it's weird to report on peaceful protests that are undemocratically banned; I think it's weird to separately report on the police doing normal police shit that happens when someone gets arrested.

    "84 year old priest has house searched by police" is newsworthy if the priest didn't do anything illegal. It's not newsworthy if they did.

    "Some people did something illegal which should not be illegal" is newsworthy, but that's not the content of the article.

    It's reporting that's just trying to play on the emotions of the readers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Why is it reasonable to go from "person participated in illegal protest" (which is NOT some extreme protest for an illegal topic), to "we're going to raid their residence"?
    How is that relevant to the act of attending a protest? Fine or jail the person as prescribed by the (inane) law and move on, searching their home is overreach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment