Why are you even responding to me? You take a vaguely dismissive position in response to me noticing a problem with how we are discussing and engaging with this and then try to railroad the conversation away from the point I was making.
Also did you even read the article yet? It isn't about that either, it's about a specific Branch's drama. It attempts to extrapolate beyond that but offers no evidence beyond referencing a document by an obvious wrecker who did engage in SA coverup.