you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 18 hours ago (8 children)

Ammonia is used for fertiliser and could be used as fuel. About 1/3rd the energy density of petrol and much easier to store than hydrogen.

Probably wouldn't want to plan to run the grid extensively on it. But if you are just having it to cover rare occasions then it could work well.

Also gotta make a shitload of it for fertiliser production anyway. Cheap excess wind/solar power could make it economically practical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago (2 children)

    But at that point why have hydrogen-based or ammonia-based energy infrastructure? Why not use the excess electricity to make fertilizer and use that to grow crops?

    Are the factories that make hydrogen so much cheaper than the factories that make fertilizer that when you build enough factories to make use of all the excess electricity (meaning they're idle 80% of the time), the cost of having those factories make fertilizer instead of hydrogen is greater than the cost of building and maintaining the entire infrastructure for using hydrogen or ammonia as energy storage/fuel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago*

    grow crops

    In reality that does not happen on its own. Once you figure in the use of land, water and energy to grow crops it's the by far most inefficient way.

    Even without the additional costs in farming and just assuming all those plants happily grow on their own, plants are still losing... "Photosynthesis turns roughly 3 percent of incoming sunlight into organic compounds [...] "Artificial photosynthesis"—comprising a PV cell that provides the electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen—turns roughly 10 percent of incoming sunlight into usable hydrogen[...]"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago (4 children)

    isn't methanol better for fuel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago (3 children)

    Is that as efficient to produce from excess energy? Especially energy that might be highly variable. Hydrogen production can be turned on/off instantaneously and only need a fairly small amount of buffer space for it if you are turning it into something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago (2 children)

    no, it requires a lot of heat. but on the other hand it binds hydrogen into a more stable form and can be made with captured carbon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments