▲ 249 ▼ Wind Power Produced 140% Of Electricity Demand in Denmark (cleantechnica.com) submitted 1 day ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/energy@slrpnk.net 80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 day ago (4 children) isn't methanol better for fuel? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) Is that as efficient to produce from excess energy? Especially energy that might be highly variable. Hydrogen production can be turned on/off instantaneously and only need a fairly small amount of buffer space for it if you are turning it into something else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) no, it requires a lot of heat. but on the other hand it binds hydrogen into a more stable form and can be made with captured carbon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 point 18 hours ago (1 child) Ammonia requires hydrogen and nitrogen from the air. Both certainly are more stable than hydrogen on its own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 17 hours ago yeah ammonia is also a good idea. a lot harder to handle safely though, it tends to corrode things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 day ago (3 children) Is that as efficient to produce from excess energy? Especially energy that might be highly variable. Hydrogen production can be turned on/off instantaneously and only need a fairly small amount of buffer space for it if you are turning it into something else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) no, it requires a lot of heat. but on the other hand it binds hydrogen into a more stable form and can be made with captured carbon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 point 18 hours ago (1 child) Ammonia requires hydrogen and nitrogen from the air. Both certainly are more stable than hydrogen on its own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 17 hours ago yeah ammonia is also a good idea. a lot harder to handle safely though, it tends to corrode things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children) no, it requires a lot of heat. but on the other hand it binds hydrogen into a more stable form and can be made with captured carbon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 point 18 hours ago (1 child) Ammonia requires hydrogen and nitrogen from the air. Both certainly are more stable than hydrogen on its own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 17 hours ago yeah ammonia is also a good idea. a lot harder to handle safely though, it tends to corrode things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 1 point 18 hours ago (1 child) Ammonia requires hydrogen and nitrogen from the air. Both certainly are more stable than hydrogen on its own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 17 hours ago yeah ammonia is also a good idea. a lot harder to handle safely though, it tends to corrode things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 17 hours ago yeah ammonia is also a good idea. a lot harder to handle safely though, it tends to corrode things. permalink fedilink source parent