438
Calls in the UK to ban sex offenders from buying smart glasses (cybernews.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51620160

I love how they put a pic of "Epstein File Mark" in the article ;)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So to you, the glasses are irrelevant. You just hate hidden cameras... Like police and various misbehaving corporations all over the world.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't say that police cameras are hidden, I assume you are referring to bodyworn cams? And I really don't know who are the misbehaving corpos you speak of. Not saying they don't exist, just that is super vague. Do you mean cctv for security? Because I dont know if i would call those hidden either?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago

    Police get caught committing crimes via hidden (or non-hidden, LOL) cameras all the time.

    The same is true for corporations (and plain old abusive bosses).

    Where I live, a company was caught making plans for illegal dumping (toxic waste) thanks to a hidden camera worn by a whistleblower.

    The most recent news about hidden cameras catching corporate misbehavior are mostly related to meat processing plants. In Texas, I believe they passed an unconstitutional law a few years ago banning people from recording (in public) near factory farms and meat processing plants.

    All this illegal/evil behavior was foiled thanks to hidden cameras.

    This is why I firmly believe in "one party" laws. Look that up if you don't know what it means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent