▲ 236 ▼ Video games (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 day ago by GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to c/gaming@lemmy.world 38 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/52327207
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 child) Lol, lots of games before The Last of Us had fantastic stories. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -2 points 9 hours ago (1 child) Oh no, not another one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 point 8 hours ago (1 child) You didn't trigger a circle jerk. You're just wrong. And based on your other comments in this thread, not a very pleasant person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 7 hours ago (1 child) You didn't even read my comment properly. If anyone's wrong here, it's objectively you, since the comment is still there for anyone to read and compare; in it's original, non-misinterpreted form. You and the other commenter somehow read one thing and ended up with a completely different conclusion, and then smugly make fun of / attack my comment based on those incorrect interpretations. So forgive me for forgoing the pleasantries in the face of unpleasantness. So: what, specifically, in my original comment is factually incorrect? Not paraphrasing. Actually carefully read my comment and directly quote the part you disagree with. Also, since apparently I'm not just of an opposing opinion to you, but actually completely "wrong", explain how it's wrong, exactly. No vagueness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Publishers and developers before 2013 did not care much about the story. This is the claim that is objectively and philosophically ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 7 hours ago* That's both misquoted and out of context. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable Notice the qualifiers. "didn't really care much", "often horribly bad", "more often it was just forgettable". None of those are absolute terms talking about every goddamn publisher and every game made before then. You also use that word "objectively" without giving any counterpoints. I don't think that word means what you think it means; you can't have an objective opinion piece. So kindly fuck right off with your high horse "ignorant". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -2 points 9 hours ago (1 child) Oh no, not another one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 point 8 hours ago (1 child) You didn't trigger a circle jerk. You're just wrong. And based on your other comments in this thread, not a very pleasant person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 7 hours ago (1 child) You didn't even read my comment properly. If anyone's wrong here, it's objectively you, since the comment is still there for anyone to read and compare; in it's original, non-misinterpreted form. You and the other commenter somehow read one thing and ended up with a completely different conclusion, and then smugly make fun of / attack my comment based on those incorrect interpretations. So forgive me for forgoing the pleasantries in the face of unpleasantness. So: what, specifically, in my original comment is factually incorrect? Not paraphrasing. Actually carefully read my comment and directly quote the part you disagree with. Also, since apparently I'm not just of an opposing opinion to you, but actually completely "wrong", explain how it's wrong, exactly. No vagueness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Publishers and developers before 2013 did not care much about the story. This is the claim that is objectively and philosophically ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 7 hours ago* That's both misquoted and out of context. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable Notice the qualifiers. "didn't really care much", "often horribly bad", "more often it was just forgettable". None of those are absolute terms talking about every goddamn publisher and every game made before then. You also use that word "objectively" without giving any counterpoints. I don't think that word means what you think it means; you can't have an objective opinion piece. So kindly fuck right off with your high horse "ignorant". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 point 8 hours ago (1 child) You didn't trigger a circle jerk. You're just wrong. And based on your other comments in this thread, not a very pleasant person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 7 hours ago (1 child) You didn't even read my comment properly. If anyone's wrong here, it's objectively you, since the comment is still there for anyone to read and compare; in it's original, non-misinterpreted form. You and the other commenter somehow read one thing and ended up with a completely different conclusion, and then smugly make fun of / attack my comment based on those incorrect interpretations. So forgive me for forgoing the pleasantries in the face of unpleasantness. So: what, specifically, in my original comment is factually incorrect? Not paraphrasing. Actually carefully read my comment and directly quote the part you disagree with. Also, since apparently I'm not just of an opposing opinion to you, but actually completely "wrong", explain how it's wrong, exactly. No vagueness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Publishers and developers before 2013 did not care much about the story. This is the claim that is objectively and philosophically ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 7 hours ago* That's both misquoted and out of context. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable Notice the qualifiers. "didn't really care much", "often horribly bad", "more often it was just forgettable". None of those are absolute terms talking about every goddamn publisher and every game made before then. You also use that word "objectively" without giving any counterpoints. I don't think that word means what you think it means; you can't have an objective opinion piece. So kindly fuck right off with your high horse "ignorant". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 7 hours ago (1 child) You didn't even read my comment properly. If anyone's wrong here, it's objectively you, since the comment is still there for anyone to read and compare; in it's original, non-misinterpreted form. You and the other commenter somehow read one thing and ended up with a completely different conclusion, and then smugly make fun of / attack my comment based on those incorrect interpretations. So forgive me for forgoing the pleasantries in the face of unpleasantness. So: what, specifically, in my original comment is factually incorrect? Not paraphrasing. Actually carefully read my comment and directly quote the part you disagree with. Also, since apparently I'm not just of an opposing opinion to you, but actually completely "wrong", explain how it's wrong, exactly. No vagueness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Publishers and developers before 2013 did not care much about the story. This is the claim that is objectively and philosophically ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 7 hours ago* That's both misquoted and out of context. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable Notice the qualifiers. "didn't really care much", "often horribly bad", "more often it was just forgettable". None of those are absolute terms talking about every goddamn publisher and every game made before then. You also use that word "objectively" without giving any counterpoints. I don't think that word means what you think it means; you can't have an objective opinion piece. So kindly fuck right off with your high horse "ignorant". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Publishers and developers before 2013 did not care much about the story. This is the claim that is objectively and philosophically ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 7 hours ago* That's both misquoted and out of context. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable Notice the qualifiers. "didn't really care much", "often horribly bad", "more often it was just forgettable". None of those are absolute terms talking about every goddamn publisher and every game made before then. You also use that word "objectively" without giving any counterpoints. I don't think that word means what you think it means; you can't have an objective opinion piece. So kindly fuck right off with your high horse "ignorant". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 point 7 hours ago* That's both misquoted and out of context. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable Notice the qualifiers. "didn't really care much", "often horribly bad", "more often it was just forgettable". None of those are absolute terms talking about every goddamn publisher and every game made before then. You also use that word "objectively" without giving any counterpoints. I don't think that word means what you think it means; you can't have an objective opinion piece. So kindly fuck right off with your high horse "ignorant". permalink fedilink source parent
