you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 6 days ago* (16 children)

Please point out the example of a truly socialist or even communist society that wasn't just cover for another oligarchy.

While you are technically correct about the definition there is no basis in reality for anything other than wealthy rule. The only revolution that even approached ending this was the Haitian. The rest are just the wealthy using people as pawns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago

    There is no such thing as "true socialism." There is just "socialism." "True" things, in their ideal form, don't exist in the real world.

    If you think a socialist society was just "another oligarchy," then by definition it is not a socialist society, so your wording disallows me from citing anything at all, because you'll just claim it wasn't "true socialism."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago (14 children)

    China lifted 800 million people out of poverty in 40 years. 90% of Chinese adults own their own home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (13 children)

    China is not socialist or communist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago (12 children)

    China is absolutely socialist, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (11 children)

    China is a Neofascist Oligarchy that formerly claimed communism and now claims some socialist policy.

    Get lost with your bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago (10 children)

    You can believe whatever you want about it but it's not gonna change reality, lmao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    It is not about belief, it is about definition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

    Oh good. Then you agree. Unless you are saying we should listen to what a country says they are as opposed to actually analyzing them. In which case you could have a point, that you are naive.

    Chinese dynasty meets capilitlism! They are the very definition of Neofascist Oligarchs.

    https://www.theglobalist.com/china-fascism-security-xi-jinping-autocracy/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 4 days ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago* (3 children)

    "is a term used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP"

    Yes, you are pretty funny. If you have no more arguments then I guess we are done. Cheers!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Do you not know how to read? These are arguments, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    "Oh good. Then you agree. Unless you are saying we should listen to what a country says they are as opposed to actually analyzing them. In which case you could have a point, that you are naive. "

    If you are just naive then you have no more arguments and we are done here. Peace be with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment