This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

Phrasing sucks. I think it means "consumers refuse to buy second-hand EVs because they fear that batteries would lose a shitton of capacity. Turns out, they're fine. The batteries, we mean."

Which is both good news (yay for good capacity on second-hand cars) and bad news (because EVs depreciate super fast and I'm counting on it to afford one, and may not depreciate as much anymore).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The bigger killer of lithium EV batteries is age. Not miles they've gone. LifePO4 last longest aft what's commonly available, but the EV cells will go bad after 12 to 20 years no matter if the cars gone 10,000 miles or 300,000 miles. The batteries chemistry simply isn't stable for long term beyond that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    yeah there's never anything good enough to replace good ol fossil fuels huh?

    this guy is a shill for exxon. every argument is bad faith, poorly reasoned or outright lies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments