▲ 73 ▼ Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice (www.xda-developers.com) submitted 3 days ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@hexbear.net 88 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/74818680 https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2026/08/msg00041.html
[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 3 days ago (1 child) Great, so why has that not happened? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Cause the models have only been reliable for like 6 months, and only cheap for the past two weeks permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 child) I work with frontier models every day that I participate in gainful employment activities, and I don't think I would call them reliable. Definitely not reliable enough to design complicated software correctly on a language there's relatively little training data on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) They struggle with design because they can't tell a good idea from a bad idea without writing a comparative essay first. You can still make it work as long as no more than a third of your sessions are about implementation. Everything else should be about exploration and planning. The human drives the design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) To be honest with you, that sounds like more effort than just making it yourself for the most part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 1 day ago It's an equal amount of effort but 10 to 100 times more productive so I actually have time to add unit tests and error recovery strategies before the managers come asking questions. I guess if your company isn't totally dysfunctional it's not as helpful but I've never even heard of a corporate dev environment not ran by idiot PMs permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 3 days ago (1 child) Cause the models have only been reliable for like 6 months, and only cheap for the past two weeks permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 child) I work with frontier models every day that I participate in gainful employment activities, and I don't think I would call them reliable. Definitely not reliable enough to design complicated software correctly on a language there's relatively little training data on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) They struggle with design because they can't tell a good idea from a bad idea without writing a comparative essay first. You can still make it work as long as no more than a third of your sessions are about implementation. Everything else should be about exploration and planning. The human drives the design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) To be honest with you, that sounds like more effort than just making it yourself for the most part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 1 day ago It's an equal amount of effort but 10 to 100 times more productive so I actually have time to add unit tests and error recovery strategies before the managers come asking questions. I guess if your company isn't totally dysfunctional it's not as helpful but I've never even heard of a corporate dev environment not ran by idiot PMs permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 child) I work with frontier models every day that I participate in gainful employment activities, and I don't think I would call them reliable. Definitely not reliable enough to design complicated software correctly on a language there's relatively little training data on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) They struggle with design because they can't tell a good idea from a bad idea without writing a comparative essay first. You can still make it work as long as no more than a third of your sessions are about implementation. Everything else should be about exploration and planning. The human drives the design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) To be honest with you, that sounds like more effort than just making it yourself for the most part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 1 day ago It's an equal amount of effort but 10 to 100 times more productive so I actually have time to add unit tests and error recovery strategies before the managers come asking questions. I guess if your company isn't totally dysfunctional it's not as helpful but I've never even heard of a corporate dev environment not ran by idiot PMs permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) They struggle with design because they can't tell a good idea from a bad idea without writing a comparative essay first. You can still make it work as long as no more than a third of your sessions are about implementation. Everything else should be about exploration and planning. The human drives the design. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) To be honest with you, that sounds like more effort than just making it yourself for the most part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 1 day ago It's an equal amount of effort but 10 to 100 times more productive so I actually have time to add unit tests and error recovery strategies before the managers come asking questions. I guess if your company isn't totally dysfunctional it's not as helpful but I've never even heard of a corporate dev environment not ran by idiot PMs permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) To be honest with you, that sounds like more effort than just making it yourself for the most part. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 1 day ago It's an equal amount of effort but 10 to 100 times more productive so I actually have time to add unit tests and error recovery strategies before the managers come asking questions. I guess if your company isn't totally dysfunctional it's not as helpful but I've never even heard of a corporate dev environment not ran by idiot PMs permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ekranoplane@hexbear.net 1 point 1 day ago It's an equal amount of effort but 10 to 100 times more productive so I actually have time to add unit tests and error recovery strategies before the managers come asking questions. I guess if your company isn't totally dysfunctional it's not as helpful but I've never even heard of a corporate dev environment not ran by idiot PMs permalink fedilink source parent