Been a long time Debian user but with the recent AI decision I am planning on moving on so anyone have an anti-AI recommendations? I understand its being used in the kernel as well but are there any distros taking a full anti-AI approach to the parts of the code they control?

Since folks seem a little confused on what I am referring to here is the mailing list page regarding the use of gen ai without disclosure vote: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/08/msg00360.html

Phoronix article on it: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Debian-Votes-Responsible-AI-Use

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 6 days ago (5 children)

making billions off it

Lol, no its all circular investing and will soon fail to prop itself up. Then all that stolen work gets sent to open weights for everyone to use. Still not the best, but you can't close Pandora's box.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    The 2008 financial crisis was the largest upwards transfer of wealth in US history. There are people who still haven't financially recovered what they lost to this day, but the US economy had regained more than it lost within 2 years. It's just that 90% of it went to those who lost the least.

    With AI being forced into general stocks and federal bailouts practically guaranteed, it's going to be the exact same scenario. The AI companies will be "too big to fail" and we'll all be footing the bill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 days ago

    Theres a ceiling to this shit though, and we are reaching it. Your population won't carry on when they can't eat, and it doesnt matter how militarized you are the US is too big to protect everything by force. You have to keep your population chill.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    It's wild that Amazon alone has already pissed away more on their own than even Nvidia has earned back. I'm also surprised that Anthropic still isn't remotely profitable given the sheer volume of money the rest of the corporate software world dumped into Claude Code and how much pressure Anthropic applied to monetize it. That alone should be enough to show that it is impossible for AI to be profitable in any traditional sense.

    Their actual plan is to monopolize information and basically use (preferably their own) AI as the middleman and broker for all data and information and knowledge and advertising that any human being ever sees. In that, they might eventually be successful. At least if they don't run out of money trying (almost certain), and we don't kill them off or blow them up first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    The meme about Nvidia selling pickaxes to gold diggers really is accurate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago

    That does seem to be their strategy, at least on its face. Although I'm not even sure I even really believe that is profitable, or if they're cooking the books with such incestuous partnership agreements that it's to the point where Nvidia might be effectively "buying" chips from themselves with their own money on their partner's behalf. I guess time will tell if they're actually the next Enron or not, but I don't trust any business that's AI related at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Still not the best, but you can't close Pandora's box.

    Then mandate local ai only. Fuck big ai company with an anchor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    No one is gonna do that when they are on the cusp of eternal surveillance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    We talk about opensource coding project what has to do with surveillance?

    I mean if want to have "ethic" ai use ban any non local ai from use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    mandate local AI only

    You said this. No one with the kingdom keys is going to do this because the actual purpose is surveillance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah but has nothing to do with context.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Ok am i wrong? What has global ai oligarchy to do with what maintainer decide for own project?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

    Well for one, most people are using cloud agents. So theres a tie. Two, and most importantly, I was simply explaining why your call for local only mandates would be laughed out of the room. AI is not here to make everyone an engineer. AI is here to put the Eye of Sauron everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments