you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Renaissance quantitative fund (only based on stat) seems to beat the market consistently : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Technologies

So was Warren buffet (mostly based on owning company and ruling them)

But that's about the only who consistently are beating the market.. but they do... so, it's possible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Buffet can sling around more money than most and tends to buy huge chunks of single companies rather than move a lot of chess pieces at once. I thought the article on Renaissance was interesting with regards to how periods of high volatility jammed up their computers/models. I wonder if all these NVIDIA chips that work well for LLMs would work well for investment style calculations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    no llm are bad at predicting market : https://www.zerve.ai/blog/llms-in-quantitative-research And I'm pretty sure it is not a human problem, a lot of fund, and intelligent people inside those, must have tried to make very advanced llm predict stock market for them. And if some succeeded (even remotely) the llm makers would have loved to publicize those.

    Quantitative model, usually use average and long term strategy, using data in the marked to anticipate how the marked would move next. High volatility move.. are just things outside of the market moving it weirdly. Models can not predict nor anticipate those. It would be like predicting a terrorist attack, or something unusual.

    Aside: High intensity trading is not a strategy, it is just a computer market maker : using known bid and ask and matching them fast, and catching a few fraction of cents every time, but doing it all the time. No prediction in that.

  • source
  • parent