you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

If there is anything obsolete about this ship it would come down to something to do with the engines, a needlessly high acoustic or radar signature or somethning else to do with a fundamentally suboptimal hull design.

More the singular point of failure that requires an enormous support structure, deck crew, and specialty maintenance/parts.

You don't need an aircraft carrier to transport helicopters along your coastline. You need it to project long range fighter bombers outside the range of your airfields.

Indonesia isn't in the business of power projection at that scale. Not unless they're trying to bomb Japan or Australia, which I certainly hope they wouldn't be crazy enough to try.

After that, it's just a boat-shaped hole in your defense budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

    You don’t need an aircraft carrier to transport helicopters along your coastline.

    If you want to do a serious amount of industrial/emergency work in an expedient manner, yes you do need something like this.

    Evacuating people? A helicopter going 5km back and forth to a vessel like this can rescue an order of magnitude more amount of people than a landbased helicopter with a base 30km away, it is simple math.

    Same principle with delivering lifesaving supplies to disaster zones en masse where roads are impassable.

    This vessel could also rescue hundreds of people from a ship sinking by maneuvering the ship close and minimizing flight time in a way a helicopter coming from far away just categorically cannot do.

  • source
  • parent