you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Permanently house and feed someone? $16,000 seems quite a bit too low. That might cover food alone I would imagine, depending on the person's age. More so if it's like a 30 year old less so if they are 60.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago* (1 child)

    It’s more like it costs more money than that to allow someone to be homeless, since they’ll be more likely to use emergency services and such.

    $16K is actually not too far off from what I spend yearly on feeding and housing myself in Seattle. Remember that most housing costs in this country are dramatically inflated by rent (aka landlord greed).

    Remember that homeless/unemployed people are likely to qualify for Medicaid and other benefits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments