you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

This initiative is just a smokescreen; it actually pushes things down the slippery slope.

Citizens must not be forced to identify themselves to access lawful online content or services unless strictly necessary, proportionate and provided by law. The legislation should require anonymous or pseudonymous proof-of-age, data minimisation, selective disclosure

Define "necessary". Define "by law". The pushers for proof-of-age already say it's anonymous – but it can't be.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 days ago

    How it's written seems suspiciously similar to how it's currently being pushed to be implemented. Additionally it opens up the possibility of it being "pseudonymous", that in practice terms is equivalent to "anonymous unless you put in some effort to identify the person"

  • source
  • parent