you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

I already know your argument is weak, because I don't have the glasses and your poor assumption is that I do. I'm all for better laws to address privacy concerns, but trying to associate glasses with a camera with all perverts is just lazy and weakens any change you'd hope to make.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    The change I would hope to make is impossible, so I don't really give a shit anymore.

    Plus, anyone willing to give money to Meta is a write off anyway, so people also calling them perverts really doesn't bother me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Real change takes time and effort. If you don't like Meta, then prototype some better open-source design that implements the positive changes you'd like to see. Or if you don't like that people even have a desire to have glasses with a camera, then look for root cause analysis of societal issues and try solving some of those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments