▲ 116 ▼ Concerned that people still don’t realise he’s a pervert, man buys Meta smart glasses (newsthump.com) submitted 3 hours ago by ZeroCool@piefed.ca to c/theonion@sh.itjust.works 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child) Lol, found the guy who already bought the glasses. People are getting tired of being recorded all the time. And trusting Meta to not be recording all the time is just hilariously naive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (1 child) I already know your argument is weak, because I don't have the glasses and your poor assumption is that I do. I'm all for better laws to address privacy concerns, but trying to associate glasses with a camera with all perverts is just lazy and weakens any change you'd hope to make. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child) The change I would hope to make is impossible, so I don't really give a shit anymore. Plus, anyone willing to give money to Meta is a write off anyway, so people also calling them perverts really doesn't bother me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Real change takes time and effort. If you don't like Meta, then prototype some better open-source design that implements the positive changes you'd like to see. Or if you don't like that people even have a desire to have glasses with a camera, then look for root cause analysis of societal issues and try solving some of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago The genie can't go back in the bottle. You can no more get rid Meta glasses than you can get rid of AI or nuclear weapons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (1 child) I already know your argument is weak, because I don't have the glasses and your poor assumption is that I do. I'm all for better laws to address privacy concerns, but trying to associate glasses with a camera with all perverts is just lazy and weakens any change you'd hope to make. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child) The change I would hope to make is impossible, so I don't really give a shit anymore. Plus, anyone willing to give money to Meta is a write off anyway, so people also calling them perverts really doesn't bother me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Real change takes time and effort. If you don't like Meta, then prototype some better open-source design that implements the positive changes you'd like to see. Or if you don't like that people even have a desire to have glasses with a camera, then look for root cause analysis of societal issues and try solving some of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago The genie can't go back in the bottle. You can no more get rid Meta glasses than you can get rid of AI or nuclear weapons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child) The change I would hope to make is impossible, so I don't really give a shit anymore. Plus, anyone willing to give money to Meta is a write off anyway, so people also calling them perverts really doesn't bother me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Real change takes time and effort. If you don't like Meta, then prototype some better open-source design that implements the positive changes you'd like to see. Or if you don't like that people even have a desire to have glasses with a camera, then look for root cause analysis of societal issues and try solving some of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago The genie can't go back in the bottle. You can no more get rid Meta glasses than you can get rid of AI or nuclear weapons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 child) Real change takes time and effort. If you don't like Meta, then prototype some better open-source design that implements the positive changes you'd like to see. Or if you don't like that people even have a desire to have glasses with a camera, then look for root cause analysis of societal issues and try solving some of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago The genie can't go back in the bottle. You can no more get rid Meta glasses than you can get rid of AI or nuclear weapons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago The genie can't go back in the bottle. You can no more get rid Meta glasses than you can get rid of AI or nuclear weapons. permalink fedilink source parent