you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

I haven't followed this story at all. Were they just clapping normally in agreement with something someone said or were they being disruptive with their clapping?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Lux Claridge, an Emporia High School physics teacher, was arrested after clapping during the meeting. Commissioners had warned those in attendance against disruptive behavior, including clapping, snapping or rude comments. Claridge and several others clapped in support of speakers opposing the Flint Hills Digital Campus data center. After commissioners issued a final warning, Claridge continued to clap, leading to their arrest.

    “I’m glad to be out — but this is an inconvenience, really. It’s not really deterring me from speaking out or I guess, clapping,” Claridge said.

    The city claims it was disruptive, but they also disallowed "snapping or rude comments". Considering they dropped all charges with no prejudice, the city was in the wrong here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 weeks ago

    Considering they dropped all charges with no prejudice, the city was in the wrong here.

    FYI: "without prejudice" means that the city prosecutors are free to refile the charges again at a later date. Or they can file a different set of charges for the same conduct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Dismissing with no prejudice means no prejudice towards the prosecution, they can refile this charge.

    Dismissing with prejudice means the authorities are forbidden from refiling the charges.

    But clearly, we don't need the hack traitor aristocrat tool cunt prosecutor dropping charges to know the city was in the wrong here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 2 weeks ago* (5 children)

    I don't have a direct link to a file but here's a clip on a regional (Nebraska) news affiliate:

    https://www.ksnblocal4.com/2026/07/27/teacher-arrested-repeatedly-clapping-favor-data-center-opponents-during-city-commission-meeting/

    pretty boring regular clapping. by the way, the speaker he clapped for right before getting arrested: his wife. literally applauding his wife for speaking up at town meeting.

    they probably asked everyone to remain completely silent and had setup"rules" for applause between speakers... knowing that 1) they don't want people to get riled up 2) it gives them pretense to remove people who say literally anything when not standing at the podium.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    It also keeps speakers from knowing that everybody supports them.

    What if EVERYBODY clapped anyway? Are they going to arrest the entire room? What if they blocked the doors, and wouldn't allow the cowardly cops to leave with the person they're trying to arrest?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Holding someone for 8 hours for disruptive clapping would also be ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments