▲ 242 ▼ When the holy one left the Fediverse, my faith in Dog was broken (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 week ago by arotrios@lemmy.world to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk 88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ratio_Tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 week ago (2 children) What happened? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] arotrios@lemmy.world [S] 99 points 1 week ago (3 children) Goodbye Post Looks like their Piefed instance incorporated a vote limit impacting a users ability to interact with their audience, and the holy one just threw up their hands at the thought of having to migrate due to instance dumbfuckery again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 77 points 1 week ago (1 child) What a weird policy decision. I don't think the Fediverse needs artificial scarcity or austerity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I wouldn't agree with it but I see why they do it. If you listen to the instance operators and comm mods talk a big priority is they're trying not to just build another reddit. So occasionally instance devs get these ideas to try and deincentivise some of the toxic patterns reddit encouraged. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atro_city@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't understand. A vote limit? As in a user can't vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) I don’t understand. A vote limit? As in a user can’t vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? Basically, it made my experience as a user shitty, in part because I was a frequent poster and thus frequently had a number of comments on my posts which were generally positive contributions and I wanted to upvote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) A... weird decision, if I may say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child) It's a minor annoyance, to try to upvote things and see nothing happen because you hit some arbitrary cap. But interacting with commenters was one of the joys of my time here, even just in small things like upvoting them, since giving inane comment replies like "Thank you!" or "I agree!" evokes anxiety from me rather than giving joy. That I hit the cap before it was even announced made me suspect that it would be a frequent frustration going forward, and one I simply had no intention of dealing with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] arotrios@lemmy.world [S] 37 points 1 week ago (1 child) The holy one had many followers, and often had more than 250 people to bestow their blessed upvote upon. Pedantry should never get in the way of good works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children) Oh it's the reverse??? A user cannot get more than X amount of votes? Dafak? Now that's crazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post. The voting limit is for votes given, not received. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago Aw. Booo. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world [S] 99 points 1 week ago (3 children) Goodbye Post Looks like their Piefed instance incorporated a vote limit impacting a users ability to interact with their audience, and the holy one just threw up their hands at the thought of having to migrate due to instance dumbfuckery again. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 77 points 1 week ago (1 child) What a weird policy decision. I don't think the Fediverse needs artificial scarcity or austerity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I wouldn't agree with it but I see why they do it. If you listen to the instance operators and comm mods talk a big priority is they're trying not to just build another reddit. So occasionally instance devs get these ideas to try and deincentivise some of the toxic patterns reddit encouraged. permalink fedilink source parent [–] atro_city@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't understand. A vote limit? As in a user can't vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) I don’t understand. A vote limit? As in a user can’t vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? Basically, it made my experience as a user shitty, in part because I was a frequent poster and thus frequently had a number of comments on my posts which were generally positive contributions and I wanted to upvote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) A... weird decision, if I may say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child) It's a minor annoyance, to try to upvote things and see nothing happen because you hit some arbitrary cap. But interacting with commenters was one of the joys of my time here, even just in small things like upvoting them, since giving inane comment replies like "Thank you!" or "I agree!" evokes anxiety from me rather than giving joy. That I hit the cap before it was even announced made me suspect that it would be a frequent frustration going forward, and one I simply had no intention of dealing with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] arotrios@lemmy.world [S] 37 points 1 week ago (1 child) The holy one had many followers, and often had more than 250 people to bestow their blessed upvote upon. Pedantry should never get in the way of good works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children) Oh it's the reverse??? A user cannot get more than X amount of votes? Dafak? Now that's crazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post. The voting limit is for votes given, not received. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago Aw. Booo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 77 points 1 week ago (1 child) What a weird policy decision. I don't think the Fediverse needs artificial scarcity or austerity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I wouldn't agree with it but I see why they do it. If you listen to the instance operators and comm mods talk a big priority is they're trying not to just build another reddit. So occasionally instance devs get these ideas to try and deincentivise some of the toxic patterns reddit encouraged. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I wouldn't agree with it but I see why they do it. If you listen to the instance operators and comm mods talk a big priority is they're trying not to just build another reddit. So occasionally instance devs get these ideas to try and deincentivise some of the toxic patterns reddit encouraged. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't understand. A vote limit? As in a user can't vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) I don’t understand. A vote limit? As in a user can’t vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? Basically, it made my experience as a user shitty, in part because I was a frequent poster and thus frequently had a number of comments on my posts which were generally positive contributions and I wanted to upvote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) A... weird decision, if I may say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child) It's a minor annoyance, to try to upvote things and see nothing happen because you hit some arbitrary cap. But interacting with commenters was one of the joys of my time here, even just in small things like upvoting them, since giving inane comment replies like "Thank you!" or "I agree!" evokes anxiety from me rather than giving joy. That I hit the cap before it was even announced made me suspect that it would be a frequent frustration going forward, and one I simply had no intention of dealing with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] arotrios@lemmy.world [S] 37 points 1 week ago (1 child) The holy one had many followers, and often had more than 250 people to bestow their blessed upvote upon. Pedantry should never get in the way of good works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children) Oh it's the reverse??? A user cannot get more than X amount of votes? Dafak? Now that's crazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post. The voting limit is for votes given, not received. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) I don’t understand. A vote limit? As in a user can’t vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience? Basically, it made my experience as a user shitty, in part because I was a frequent poster and thus frequently had a number of comments on my posts which were generally positive contributions and I wanted to upvote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) A... weird decision, if I may say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child) It's a minor annoyance, to try to upvote things and see nothing happen because you hit some arbitrary cap. But interacting with commenters was one of the joys of my time here, even just in small things like upvoting them, since giving inane comment replies like "Thank you!" or "I agree!" evokes anxiety from me rather than giving joy. That I hit the cap before it was even announced made me suspect that it would be a frequent frustration going forward, and one I simply had no intention of dealing with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) A... weird decision, if I may say so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child) It's a minor annoyance, to try to upvote things and see nothing happen because you hit some arbitrary cap. But interacting with commenters was one of the joys of my time here, even just in small things like upvoting them, since giving inane comment replies like "Thank you!" or "I agree!" evokes anxiety from me rather than giving joy. That I hit the cap before it was even announced made me suspect that it would be a frequent frustration going forward, and one I simply had no intention of dealing with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child) It's a minor annoyance, to try to upvote things and see nothing happen because you hit some arbitrary cap. But interacting with commenters was one of the joys of my time here, even just in small things like upvoting them, since giving inane comment replies like "Thank you!" or "I agree!" evokes anxiety from me rather than giving joy. That I hit the cap before it was even announced made me suspect that it would be a frequent frustration going forward, and one I simply had no intention of dealing with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) What made you switch instances to piefed in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) I was never a fan of the Lemmy developers, who engage in a... concerning amount of genocide and atrocity denial. In fact, I didn't want to swap to Lemmy.world to begin with - I originally picked Kbin despite Lemmy fitting my aesthetic preferences better. But when Kbin went down permanently, I wanted to move all my comms quickly so they didn't die, and Mbin's main instance at the time was... not federating well. So when Piefed started to become stable, I saw an opportunity to move away from the Lemmy software, whose devs were constantly asking for money even on non-ML instances (as is normal and is necessary for software development - but again, that's exactly why I wasn't comfortable with Lemmy. You're either a free-rider or helping support the ideals of the ideologically repugnant). Rimu seemed reasonable in my brief chats with him at the time - and I still don't think he's unreasonable, per se, just with very... core disagreements about what direction Piefed should be going (ie the notion that 'power users' are undesirable and should be limited) and what that will lead to, especially the aforementioned enshittification of my own, personal experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago Thank you for the insight. I've been on mbin for a while now and can say that I enjoy it. It does lack some features (like blocking domains), but it's quite pleasurable to use now. The upside is that it also can see mastodon and peertube and pixelfed. So far, I haven't read anything concerning about the devs nor any plans for limiting power-users. Maybe they might be a good fit (and hopefully be the final switch, if you're still thinking about it). Good luck! I hope you can still enjoy the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world [S] 37 points 1 week ago (1 child) The holy one had many followers, and often had more than 250 people to bestow their blessed upvote upon. Pedantry should never get in the way of good works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children) Oh it's the reverse??? A user cannot get more than X amount of votes? Dafak? Now that's crazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post. The voting limit is for votes given, not received. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children) Oh it's the reverse??? A user cannot get more than X amount of votes? Dafak? Now that's crazy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post. The voting limit is for votes given, not received. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post. The voting limit is for votes given, not received. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 point 6 days ago fedia.io is Mbin, so can receive basically infinite upvotes. Only certain PieFed instances are shadow-censoring offered upvotes, and unfortunately the feature is enabled by default (opt-out rather than opt-in). permalink fedilink source parent