you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 73 points 11 hours ago* (4 children)

I love graphene, but I hope they're planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene's long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users' standards.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    Yeah by "switch to" they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that's a later phase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    There are some third party vendors online that ship pre-flashed GrapheneOS phones iirc, but I don't believe there has ever been on with it factory installed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    I would never trust a pre flashed Graphene phone. Always flash yourself for security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 hours ago

    I agree, you should always flash it yourself. Though GrapheneOS does have the Auditor app to attest the integrity of the operating system against another GrapheneOS device. It's always going to be best practice to do it yourself, however.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 hours ago

    Motorola should be able to lead them into the right direction for this. Moto controls their own drivers and while i don't know, i don't expect they're using stock android camera, they can probably just provide the camera app to graphene

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    There are some really talented people working on the camera systems for Apple and Google etc. what I don’t get is surely there are some equally talented engineers (in image processing) who love open source so why aren’t they working on an open source camera platform?

    It seems an itch that’s not getting scratched.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments