▲ 124 ▼ Copyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software? (fsfe.org) submitted 6 days ago by ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world to c/programming@programming.dev 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 child) Right but why would we want to license vibecoded slop? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago (2 children) Irrelevant question. For licensing and copyright questions, quality of code is not important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 point 5 days ago See Microsoft and Google. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Senal@programming.dev 1 point 5 days ago (1 child) Why would we want to license vibecoded slop code built with a system that is (in most cases) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 child) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all You answered your own question. I don't know what you try to say, but the article and our discussion is explaining if and why licensing code that is vibe coded is possible or makes sense at all. And you point the problem out that this is problematic and probably not possible in good faith. So its not about what we want, but about if and what is possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago Indeed, though I was just rephrasing the question from the person you were replying to. Responded to the wrong comment, apologies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago (2 children) Irrelevant question. For licensing and copyright questions, quality of code is not important. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 point 5 days ago See Microsoft and Google. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Senal@programming.dev 1 point 5 days ago (1 child) Why would we want to license vibecoded slop code built with a system that is (in most cases) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 child) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all You answered your own question. I don't know what you try to say, but the article and our discussion is explaining if and why licensing code that is vibe coded is possible or makes sense at all. And you point the problem out that this is problematic and probably not possible in good faith. So its not about what we want, but about if and what is possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago Indeed, though I was just rephrasing the question from the person you were replying to. Responded to the wrong comment, apologies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 point 5 days ago (1 child) Why would we want to license vibecoded slop code built with a system that is (in most cases) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 child) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all You answered your own question. I don't know what you try to say, but the article and our discussion is explaining if and why licensing code that is vibe coded is possible or makes sense at all. And you point the problem out that this is problematic and probably not possible in good faith. So its not about what we want, but about if and what is possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago Indeed, though I was just rephrasing the question from the person you were replying to. Responded to the wrong comment, apologies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 child) probably and admittedly actively using data from sources with incompatible licences or no licences at all You answered your own question. I don't know what you try to say, but the article and our discussion is explaining if and why licensing code that is vibe coded is possible or makes sense at all. And you point the problem out that this is problematic and probably not possible in good faith. So its not about what we want, but about if and what is possible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago Indeed, though I was just rephrasing the question from the person you were replying to. Responded to the wrong comment, apologies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago Indeed, though I was just rephrasing the question from the person you were replying to. Responded to the wrong comment, apologies. permalink fedilink source parent