The biggest argument for the answer being “Yes” would seem to be their contributions to the Kessler Syndrome but I’m really not that up to speed on how severe or critical the situation currently is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

That depends on why you think it's immoral today.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    That was kind of the reason for the question.

    Basically, Musk is the reason I would not give the company money. The Kessler syndrome was the only other thing on my radar, but it sounds like that’s not really an issue based on other responses.

    So I was hoping to find if there were any other issues with the company I should be aware of…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 28 minutes ago (1 child)

    The way I see it, Starlink is more a military tech than civilian. It is a huge gamechanger on the battlefield and in the drone technology - it is the cheapest and most reliable way to obtain high speed network connection on a middlestrike drone.

    So what Starlink would do depends on the will of American government. And that depends on who's in charge. With all the consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments