you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

Jeffries:

Now, there’s a bipartisan bill sent over from the Senate. Every single Senate Democrat, every single Senate Republican supported that legislation. It would reopen the TSA, reopen FEMA, reopen the Coast Guard, reopen the ability for our cybersecurity professionals to do their job, while at the same time allowing for discussions—tough negotiations—to continue. On one side of that negotiations are my Republican colleagues who want to continue to spend taxpayer dollars to brutalize and kill American citizens, unleashing masked, untrained ICE agents, in some cases storming homes of everyday Americans, ripping them out of their beds in the middle of the night, ripping children away from their families, detaining people in inhumane conditions, refusing to allow state and local authorities to investigate ICE violence and brutality in ways that will be designed to bring about accountability.

This debate, at the end of the day, is really all about: Do you want to compel ICE to conduct themselves like every other cop, police officer or law enforcement agency in the country? Or do you want to continue to spend billions of taxpayer dollars to violently target American citizens and law abiding immigrant families? We choose the American way—fair, just and humane. Now, many of my Republican colleagues have come to the Floor to suggest that this legislation is about defunding ICE. That’s a stone cold lie. Because we know that in the Republican One Big Ugly Bill, which ripped away Medicaid from 14 million Americans, the largest cut—almost a trillion dollars—to Medicaid in American history, at the same period of time, extremist Republicans in their One Big Ugly Bill enacted a $186 billion cut to nutritional assistance—literally ripped food from the mouths of hungry children, seniors and veterans.

https://jeffries.house.gov/2026/03/27/leader-jeffries-floor-remarks-opposing-republican-bill-funding-ice-brutality-and-continuing-airport-chaos/

That is how

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [+] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    https://jeffries.house.gov/2026/02/06/leader-jeffries-on-npr-we-want-to-make-sure-that-ice-agents-are-conducting-themselves-like-every-other-law-enforcement-agency/

    HE WANTS TO REFORM ICE NOT REMOVE IT.

    Please do a bit of research before insulting others for lack of knowledge, understanding and common decency

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    NOT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN WANTS TO REMOVE IT AND WE'RE DISCUSSING HOW JEFFRIES IS BETTER THAN EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN.

    Because of the DNC, including Jeffries, the ICE funding lapsed until the GOP passed a reconciliation budget without them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Again he doesn't want to remove anything just give it better optics. No reform, nothing but giving ice better training on how to assault Americans and get away with it just like the police.

    Because of the DNC, including Jeffries, the ICE funding lapsed until the GOP passed a reconciliation budget without them.

    Again you keep arguing the republicans are the only issue when Jeffries is part of the reason why they are in power, is currently already working with them and had a hand in ice getting the funding in the first place while you're only argument on why he's better is making the republicans ignore him completely

    Can you not see how none of that makes at difference as he is actively planning with Republicans to continue screwing the country?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    It was literally in lapsed funding earlier this year lmfao

    That's not just optics. Some ICE offices were vacant for weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That's not just optics

    Did you read anything but the word optics?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago*

    Did you read the part about Jeffries being better than every single Republican? Does that piss you off, Tankie?

    You're eloquence is off the scale as always. Yeah anyone saying someone actively working with the republicans are better than the republicans is extremely irritating.

    Along with those unable to read or comprehend that

  • source
  • parent