▲ 351 ▼ Chinese memory firm CXMT relied on leaked Samsung technology to skip years of R&D, court testimony claims (www.techspot.com) submitted 1 week ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ladicius@lemmy.world -6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) You mean 40 years of delay for the destruction of our biosphere? I'd call that a win. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 child) 40 years of burning far more coal than necessary due to inefficient engines Whether the overall effect was positive or negative with respect to the biome, no clue permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jdr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago That's why I said we don't know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 child) 40 years of burning far more coal than necessary due to inefficient engines Whether the overall effect was positive or negative with respect to the biome, no clue permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jdr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago That's why I said we don't know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago That's why I said we don't know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago That's why I said we don't know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more permalink fedilink source parent