▲ 906 ▼ "No precedent in American history!" NYT would have defended child labor. (thelemmy.club) submitted 13 hours ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/workreform@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children) Not in the US, but elsewhere yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago Funny how the Supreme Court used precedents from other countries, some from before the US even existed, to overturn Roe v. Wade. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Saapas@piefed.zip 2 points 7 hours ago Well it does specify "American history" meaning the US here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago Funny how the Supreme Court used precedents from other countries, some from before the US even existed, to overturn Roe v. Wade. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 2 points 7 hours ago Well it does specify "American history" meaning the US here. permalink fedilink source parent