you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just watched Stalker by Tarkovsky a few days ago. I assume it might be something of a well known movie for the community here, I don't really know but it was a masterclass for me in script, cinematography and composition. My real question I guess; cause I haven't researched anything about the author or the movie itself, is how they managed to get those kind of locations. I guess it wasn't that hard inside the URSS.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    Its a great film. I really like Mirror as well so I'd recommend that next. Its also shot wonderfully.

    The locations from stalker are amazing, but unfortunately some of them were actually toxic and it's assumed that's what caused Tarkovsky's cancer.

    Tarkovsky got pretty much all he would ask for to make his films, but if you want to see a real "blank check" type film, the multi part War and Peace adaption is unbelievable in how much they were given to do it.

    The USSR was a great place to be an artist tbh, even considering certain limitations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    I just showed this for one of our movie nights! Tarkovsky is one of the great Soviet directors. Long shots, lots of water, beautifully composed. Solaris (1971?) and Andrei Rublev (1966) are great if you're looking for more by him.

    Stalker was filmed in and around Tallinn, IIRC. The shoot was downstream of a chemical plant and an abandoned hydroelectric plant. As for how they got (access to?) those locations, Soviet filmmakers could do all kinds of stuff one couldn't in the studio system. There's some interviews with Tarkovsky about the creative process there.

    They actually shot the film once, but it got developed incorrectly, so they had to shoot the entire film from scratch.

  • source
  • parent