solidheron comments on Flock's fastest-growing business is 60 mph police drones that can read license plates from the sky

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

They need a reason to be different? Kinda getting desperate.

Yeah I don't see fiber optic being useful for flock cameras because well a car can run into the fiber optic cables and either pull it out of the drone or the operator using it. And it's liability let's say you they land on a power line and get fried or short the grid.

Could you imagine winding up a fiber optic cable every time just you use a flock camera? Yeah your gonna use the wireless model.

My ideas are probably already implemented. Either because I got them from someone else or I got them from an existing technology.

If anything I'm importing the ideas from Russian war

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

They need a reason to be different?

Yes, they need differences to be different. Sorry if that doesn't make sense to you.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

But that's not a reason nor does it explain why they need a reason to be different. Curious if you'll go metaphysical.

They are different I'm just laughing at that "for no reason" response. It's like you meant it to mean something.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

Nah, it's just that you're being pedantic (or suck at reading comprehension).

"I feel that liquid water and gaseous water have a significantly different chemical formula."

You feel that way for no apparent reason. Pedantically, the reason could be "because you are lying" or "because you are dumb." Practically, we both know you might mean to say, "Well, chemically they are the same, but one is less dense."

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah you went metaphysical. I don't consider liquid water a chemical formula, but chemical formula will state if water is liquid or a gas.

Buuuut you kinda lost on drone argument. MAGA acts the same way when they lose an argument just start another argument to lose to distract from the last argument they lost.

I always end up thinking that they may forget the details, but they don't forget the emotions they went through as they lost, so they accumulating bad emotions.

You're 2 best options are to admit I'm right (on somethings) or actually prove me wrong. You ain't doing so good on option 2

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

Yeah you went metaphysical.

Buuuut you kinda lost on drone argument. MAGA acts the same way when they lose an argument just start another argument to lose to distract from the last argument they lost.

No I didn't. I used a metaphor. If that's above your comprehension, I'm sorry but I lack the tools and experience to help you with that.

The rest of your comment is just smug trolling, so enjoy the block. A quick glance at your profile shows I won't be missing out on much.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago

Oh cool you're actually quoting me instead of summarize what I said.

Going metaphysical is different than using metaphors. I should say "going meta" because you're not talking about drones anymore. You're talking about how I talk.

Going metaphysical reference people talking on some metaphysical level about behavior and what it means

permalink

fedilink

source

parent