376
Flock's fastest-growing business is 60 mph police drones that can read license plates from the sky (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Privacy groups warn that flying plate readers could expand surveillance far beyond roadside cameras.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

But that's not a reason nor does it explain why they need a reason to be different. Curious if you'll go metaphysical.

They are different I'm just laughing at that "for no reason" response. It's like you meant it to mean something.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Nah, it's just that you're being pedantic (or suck at reading comprehension).

    "I feel that liquid water and gaseous water have a significantly different chemical formula."

    You feel that way for no apparent reason. Pedantically, the reason could be "because you are lying" or "because you are dumb." Practically, we both know you might mean to say, "Well, chemically they are the same, but one is less dense."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah you went metaphysical. I don't consider liquid water a chemical formula, but chemical formula will state if water is liquid or a gas.

    Buuuut you kinda lost on drone argument. MAGA acts the same way when they lose an argument just start another argument to lose to distract from the last argument they lost.

    I always end up thinking that they may forget the details, but they don't forget the emotions they went through as they lost, so they accumulating bad emotions.

    You're 2 best options are to admit I'm right (on somethings) or actually prove me wrong. You ain't doing so good on option 2

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Yeah you went metaphysical.

    Buuuut you kinda lost on drone argument. MAGA acts the same way when they lose an argument just start another argument to lose to distract from the last argument they lost.

    No I didn't. I used a metaphor. If that's above your comprehension, I'm sorry but I lack the tools and experience to help you with that.

    The rest of your comment is just smug trolling, so enjoy the block. A quick glance at your profile shows I won't be missing out on much.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Oh cool you're actually quoting me instead of summarize what I said.

    Going metaphysical is different than using metaphors. I should say "going meta" because you're not talking about drones anymore. You're talking about how I talk.

    Going metaphysical reference people talking on some metaphysical level about behavior and what it means

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent