no lib actually thinks that people dying is a bad thing in all cases. if it were 3000 war criminals, or 3000 syrian "militants," or 3000 iraqi republican guard, etc they'd be fine with it. this purely a case of generic americans not being on their list of groups they're bloodthirsty about.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 3 years ago (1 child)

The first one isn't true. Libs love war criminals.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago

Libs love war criminals.

Terms and conditions us-foreign-policy apply, offer not valid in "foreign regimes" (unless they're doing Amerikkkas dirty work)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] ThePenitentOne@discuss.online 20 points 3 years ago

As long as it was the 'right' Americans, they would be ok with them being on the list. They pretend to act like violence is always wrong, all while ignoring the fact the entire world (and especially the USA) utilises violence constantly, and that they themselves are fine with it.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] worker_bear@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago*

one of the maybe-later-kiddo on this site last week dropped the incredibly galaxy brained take that putin invaded ukraine because it was "the will of the russian people"

out of all the things I wanted to say, I just left him with "thank you for admitting america deserved 9/11"

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 years ago

🐐 = 💩💩💩💩

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] HornyOnMain@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago*

They hate us for our freedoms no-oil

permalink

fedilink

source

parent