you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 159 points 2 days ago* (5 children)

Ironically this page seems to be entirely made of slop, the whole text reeks of claudisms, as opposed to https://noslopgrenade.com/

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    What really seals it is the 'angry' version, which is just the same message again but with different formatting. No human would label that as "the angry version" without the inclusion of at least one "fucking".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    It says “but for fucks sake” in the angry version though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Oh yeah, you're right, there is a swear in it! I do still feel it's extremely tame for being an "angry" voice though. For comparison, this is what a human sounds like when ranting about a topic they care about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    I honestly think the styling is the main reason it feels AI.

    because the sentences are too short, they're a style I sort of writes at times. Just sort of. LLMs tends to output longer sentences, rather than the two-three words. Then dot. That's a rare one for LLM

    However it's not an anti AI site, so they might have vibe styled it and probably had a LLM help with some of the wording. However I think a human did vet and rewrite parts of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    Em dashes being associated with AI is a disservice to them; in many cases they're a far more suitable use of punctuation in interrupting a sentence than parentheses.

    In this instance, however, the em dashes between the first and second parts of sentences would be better replaced with semicolons than commas, in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    Yea, if it would have been only the em dashes, I would not have shared it but it was also committed by Claude which heightens the possibility of the text also being generated I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago*

    They're definitely more likely to be used by AI than by the average person, but I think that's in large part because people aren't generally taught to use them, along with their absence from keyboards.

    Since keyboards have two minus sign keys, I have a script running on my computer to automatically replace one of their inputs with an em dash.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I mean, to be fair, if I have to extend something to meet a word minimum I naturally ramble like a bot just filling it up with pointless junk.

    Why I did so much better in "business writing" at uni, they rarely gave me minimums, only the need for usable content that met the criteria for a proper answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah, but "Here's what you just did" and the "What you sent instead says:" and especially the "The whole thing. Yes, even the bullets. Especially the bullets."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments