you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 106 points 2 days ago* (6 children)

The thing they have to fight though is that when you register for a trademark, it doesnt apply to every sector. Apple cannot for example and sue farm conglomerates for using the word apple on their actual apples. They do not hold the trademark in terms of produce.

For example, Nintendo lost a trademark to a supermarket in I think costa rica named "Super Mario" (it was a supermarket owned by a guy named mario), because Nintendo did not own the trademark rights to supermarkets(however they held one for food products branded it, so the same supermarket could not name their home branded products super mario)

Its a matter if the band holds the trademark for movies, as the band in the show itself is not called Demon Hunters (its Hunter/x)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    The movie title is referring to a fictional band, so even if you google “demon hunters band” you’re almost certainly going to get K-Pop Demon Hunters nowadays. I wouldn’t even know how to search for them and reliably get them to show up.

    …well except this news story has gone viral so now they DO show up on top. The internet is weird man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    search engine SEOs are a separate issue than trademarks though. there isn't any law that im aware of that requires search engines to be neutral on how searches are organized (or even if something shows at all). If Demon Hunter wants to fight against not being able to be found, theyd essentially for example, be fighting against every corporate who uses DMCA powers to force google to remove some links from being indexed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    By using the old ways of search fu.

    "Demon Hunter Christian Rock -pop -k-pop -k-pop"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    What search engine do you use that respects that type of search now? I’ve found that for years now Google just ignores the -pop or sometimes just ignores the “-“ and adds the thing I’m trying to avoid directly to the search query.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    What search engine do you use that respects that type of search now?

    kagi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I hate monthly subscription anything, though. I don't want to pay $5 a month to search for things. Duckduckgo is fine, and it also works with -

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I don't think Kagi are unfair charging a subscription, it means they have financial incentives which aren't mass cyberstalking like the adtech search providers. If a commercial service is free, you are almost certainly the real product.

    I'm happy with their pricing and service level, while I prefer to self-host good luck self-hosting a search engine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    You are right, but this isn't a video game versus a grocery store chain comparison here. It's a real life band vs a movie of a fictional band. The question of trademark infringement is not necessarily even about direct competition or intentional use. It is about whether a reasonable consumer of their product might confuse the two names/logos.

    Were the movie just about some typical warriors fighting demons and otherwise just sharing a similar name, I doubt that they would have much of a case due to lack of overlap. But as the film is about a band (even if the band itself has a different name), and the actual soundtrack for this fictional band is immensely popular and carries the film name, and they're selling live shows with the artists who created the actual music under the same name. I think they could make a really good case about consumer confusion.

    Edit: They even demonstrate actual consumer confusion that has already occurred in their court filing.

    To prove their point, included in the filing is an email from a person who spent $500 on top-tier tickets to a Demon Hunter concert in Albany, thinking they were purchasing admission to a KPop Demon Hunters event for their children, aged five and six.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    I think they are or did also sue Apple Theaters even tho Apple Theaters was operating long before Apple TV.

    It’s like the Buc-ees gas station suing an underwear company because they had a squirrel logo (Buc—ees logo is a beaver).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    That's probably why they chose Apple as an example in the first place. Apple Computers was allowed to continue using the name because their computer business didn't overlap Apple Corps' music business.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I wonder if using just Mario for the food would be fine.

    Go to Super Mario's and then get Mario's lasagna!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    First names literally cannot be trademakred for living beings, but they can for commerce purposes so long as said commerced entity doesn't also attempt to sue Mario for also using his born name on a non-trademarked product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    I dont understand what you mean by the so long as part?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    A notable high-profile legal defeat over first name usage involves reality star Kylie Jenner losing a trademark opposition against international pop singer Kylie Minogue.

    Basically, the name Kylie is perceived by the public as a first name, NOT a brand and therefore is unenforceable in a court of law. They can continue with the trademark all they want, but their limited to only suing other companies, not humans using the name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    The thing they have to fight though is that when you register for a trademark, it doesn't apply to every sector.

    Absolutely true! Which is why it's good that they're both in the entertainment sector.
    And I'm sure it's a non zero percentage of people who do think the fictional band is called Demon Hunters. But that may not even matter. There is a lot of overlap, being both in entertainment, and about music and bands etc. Hell, both are even about actual demons! This is a Christian metal band after all.

  • source
  • parent