The evidence suggests that lowering speed limits to 30 km/h (13.2674 candela per British thermal unit foot-pound for the seppos) massively increases survivability and decreases permanent injury rates in collisions with pedestrians: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S002243752400152X

Realistically for most commutes this equates to a couple of minutes extra driving. Most delays are at lights/intersections not low speed limits.

Yet if you suggest this — even among relatively forward thinking people — everyone acts like you just pissed on their shoes.

Why the hell does this happen? Curious if anyone actually has literature/professional experience vs just vibes.

other discussions cause one paper is just an example: https://acrs.org.au/evidence-supports-30km-h-speed-limits-in-school-zones/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 5 days ago

My unkind perspective is that drivers are maniacs who have lost the ability to cooperate and compromise with other people in a civilized setting.

This is painfully aligned with my perspective as well. I unfortunately have to drive over an hour each way to work, most of that time on country back roads, but as soon as I hit the major highway I can immediately feel the borderline homicidal energy that other drivers give off.

As I’ve gotten older I’ve realized that +- 5 minutes on any commute should be expected and can be accounted for. There is no need to be aggro and endanger people around you just so you can save face and not admit you planned poorly. It’s really unsettling to the point where my partner and I only venture out to those areas when absolutely necessary because the immediate stress we feel is palpable.

That said, it’s also extremely unsurprising to hear that those people hold onto that homidical energy and bring it to a townhall meeting. Absolutely unhinged shit that I can only imagine will keep getting worse…

  • source
  • parent