you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Please stop giving him attention. He plastered his shitty crypto coin everywhere on all leaks from like 2023. He clearly has different agenda, not "protecting the gamers". Dude is doing a crypto exit scam.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • Eh, it's not like anybody's actually got the sack to post the leaked video. The fact that they're hiding it doesn't necessarily mean they disagree with his politics/crypto bullshit, but it does mean they aren't supporting his activity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    on all leaks from like 2023

    Well, this aged like milk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Can you please elaborate? I stopped following the dude, but he kept posting leaks from 2023 build. Did he get the 2026 build or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I am not PCGamer lol, email them about it 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    If you didn't want comments, why post?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -14 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments.

    If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake.

    Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁.

    I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well.

    But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn't have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    This has got to be a fuckin bot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    Because I replied to your tomfoolery?
    Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting.

    But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns.

    Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments