▲ 105 ▼ Grand Theft Auto 6 leaker says they won't stop until Rockstar and Take-Two apologize for 'anti-consumerism' and make a 'concrete commitment to do better' (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 4 days ago by arules@retrofed.com to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 child) If you didn't want comments, why post? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] arules@retrofed.com [S] -14 points 4 days ago* (1 child) the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments. If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake. Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁. I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well. But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn't have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) This has got to be a fuckin bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] -4 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Because I replied to your tomfoolery? Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting. But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns. Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] 0 points 3 days ago Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁. I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] arules@retrofed.com [S] -14 points 4 days ago* (1 child) the cool thing about piefed&pylova, is that I read both your unedited undeleted comments. If a Journal make the mistake giving attention to a scammer, why does a threadie have to attend to the Journal’s mistake. Did you just came off internet class or something? I am just another crossposter. @inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world was the first to give the scammer a 🔁. I did tell @redacted@infosec.pub who a is supposed to address, if a really wants to correct the Journal’s mistake. Everyone else that upranked a’s comment can do so as well. But yes, you can absolutely comment something addressing me, that I did. Otherwise I wouldn't have left the «🔔Notify about replies» enabled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) This has got to be a fuckin bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] -4 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Because I replied to your tomfoolery? Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting. But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns. Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] 0 points 3 days ago Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁. I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) This has got to be a fuckin bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] -4 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Because I replied to your tomfoolery? Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting. But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns. Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] 0 points 3 days ago Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁. I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arules@retrofed.com [S] -4 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Because I replied to your tomfoolery? Or because you fear the consequences of libeling me responsible for a Jornal‘s mistake? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting. But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns. Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] 0 points 3 days ago Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁. I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 child) I'm not trying to bully you or bandwagon you, into not posting. But you have to acknowledge your own free will. No one made you crosspost this. And no one is preventing you from addressing concerns with the leaker's motives in whatever way you deem fit: be that deleting the post or editing the OP to include those concerns. Saying the equivalent of "someone else messed up, so it's fine if I don't clean up" is a shiftless ideology. It is neither a good nor a popular position to debate from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] arules@retrofed.com [S] 0 points 3 days ago Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁. I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arules@retrofed.com [S] 0 points 3 days ago Then take it up with the first responders. I found all of this silly, so I 🔁. I am unsure if you caught up, but our scammer released a build. permalink fedilink source parent