you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 6 days ago (1 child)

You mean a graph of connections between neurons, right? Like your brain? Also trained off internet forums?

All I'm getting from this conversation is that you don't have a good argument for your own capacity for feeling. Prove to Me that you can feel, so I can be reassured you're not biased.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    No I don't mean that. It's not the graph that matters in a graph of neurons, that's just the representation of the actual thing. But that's all the is with the LLM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    If thoughts are made of information, which seems to Me a logical assumption, then a mathematical operation which reproduces the function of a neural network should be just as capable of thought as the neural network itself. And if the math is accurate, it should think exactly the same things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    It's not reproducing the function of a neural network, though. It's mapping pieces of words being near other pieces of words. That's it. Stop attributing extra shit to a big spreadsheet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago* (1 child)

    Nah, LLMs are actually artificial neural networks.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model

    A large language model (LLM) is an AI model (typically a neural network)

    See? (Does the floss)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

    Not any more than a picture of you is an artificial simulation of you. It only looks like it. It doesn't matter what they call it, it's not a network of neurons or things that even resemble them in function.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments