Rimu recently started a new rant thread. I copied the response of the person they had targeted and in less than a minute Rimu had deleted the comment.

This is the comment Rimu did not want people being able to see: https://feddit.uk/post/53824748/26875911

This is the thread I shared it on: https://feddit.uk/post/53824747

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 100 points 2 months ago (94 children)

I don't see how people can still use piefed with someone like this in charge. A new red flag pops up every month. It's hard to see them among all the other red flags.

  • source
  • hideshow 94 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    good news, nobody who like Piefed has to use it. we've gotten PyLova to the point it's running Quokk.au and Anarchist.Nexus, and we've not only removed the censorship and the bias, but we've also improved the UI, made some new themes, and most important of all patched some security vulnerabilities.

    at this point it's better than Piefed in every way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Just curious, but why not use Lemmy instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    For me in particular:

    • reactions (prevents rank abuse)
    • tags
    • mirror integration
    • multi-com interactivity
    • remote instance cannot delete posts/comments by default (gaslight abuse)
    • <img height="auto">

    Other stuff idcb:

    • polls
    • comment voting (stackoverflow)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    This is my first hearing of PyLova, could I get a rundown? Is it a fork of piefed? Seperate project? Are there things it has that piefed doesnt, or things piefed has that PyLova doesnt currently? What's the state of app support (I assume not there presently, which is totally fair)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    It's a fork of piefed that's currently more feature advanced. If you scroll through the comments on this post somebody else posted more details about said features.

    App support is identical to piefed, since the api is the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Some people still believe @dessalines@lemmy.ml and @nutomic@lemmy.ml are out to get them I guess. It's ironic because every talking point about developer overreach and unilateral decisions applies to piefed more than it does Lemmy. I know it has more features and it feels like Lemmy 1.0 is taking forever, I'm still holding out hope for it and making do with what we have here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Totally agree with you. Which sucks because I really wanted to like the project. But the more stuff that comes out about it and the creator just makes me shake my head.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Same here. I even tried it, finding the whole project tainted with Rimus outspoken ideals. While, on lemmy, all the bullshit is in the open and corralled into the devs pet instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I appreciate how the lemmy developers keep their views and moderation decisions separate from the software. Opinions and moderation are unavoidably divisive topics. Keeping that separate from the software itself is smart. I don't hold their views against the lemmy platform because of that separation.

    I wish Rimu would see the wisdom in keeping those things separate. Its damaging to piefed, which is otherwise quite good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (63 replies)