you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Pro, but as a temporary measure to eliminate fossil fuel usage, and it should be replaced with renewable energy later. But I doubt anything like that will ever happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Indeed, it would be a good temporary solution if we had started 30-40 years ago.. I'm afraid that where we'll past the point of a well thought of transition to renewable energy sources.

    Also its a pretty outdated technical principle of boiling water with heat. Sun, wind and hydro has become way more efficient since then.

  • source
  • parent