862

Baby boomers comprised a larger share of voters in 2024, accounting for 32%, but they are trending lower after hitting a peak of 36% in 2016.

Ocasio-Cortez, a millennial herself, expects the younger generation will soon tip the scales in American politics.

“Millennials are not punk kids anymore. We’re grown adults with mortgages and kids,” she said. “And we—that generation is starting to be decisive at the polls. And there is anger at being ignored, sidelined, having our economic futures mortgaged by the generations that came before us on everything from the economy to climate. And we’re taking the reins.”

From global warming to debt crisis to lack of affordable health insurance (all intentional), Boomers have definitely overstayed their welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] samsamsamsam@discuss.online 69 points 20 hours ago

This framing gets it wrong. It isn’t boomers vs. millennials. It isn’t immigrants vs. citizens. It’s ordinary people fighting over a shrinking share while an extraordinarily wealthy few accumulate more money, assets and political power than they could ever need. Stop turning class problems into generational wars. Tax extreme wealth.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 19 hours ago

I agree that is class war but boomers are enabling the wealthy.

Boomers would rather punish millennials for our avocado toast than see billionaires taxed.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Not all boomers.

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Again, you are falling for their propaganda. "Boomers" wants no such thing, but fascists do. Fascists comes in all ages, including millenials and gen zs. This is not about age, it is about whether you are in the ruling class or not.

It is not generational war, it is class war.

[-] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago

Yeah that's a hard one to understand though, I had to see people my own age teaching hate worse than "the boomers" before realizing them dying out won't fix the real problem.

[-] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

There’s also a non-negligible amount of Gen X, millennials and Gen Z who are fascist supporters.

Fascist appeal transcends generational lines.

[-] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

It can be both. I don't know a whole lot of retirees that want better for the next generation and are willing to sacrifice for that.

[-] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

“Boomers” wants no such thing, but fascists do

I would say "boomers" have largely contributed to the conditions that have brought about fascism in this country, and have normalized looking the other way in service to the almighty dollar.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I must have missed a memo, since the boomers did do quite a lot to push things forward, too. Not all boomers are Faux watchers FFS.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I think it's no surprise boomers though who struggle to learn new tricks and are more susceptible to snake-oil scams and fear mongering. That's not inherently unique to one generation, for we'll be there one day too.

Though I'll say they and GenX may standout a bit more, having grown up in an era so far removed from the modern tech world.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Baby Boomers have voted more Republican than both the generation that came before them and the generation that came after them.

[-] Frettchen@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

There is a story for everyone. For you it's Boomer for others expats and yet for others men. (Or Flanders)

Everyone gets his story so a small portion can fly private!

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Exactly right. They manufacture enemies out of us and enjoy their yachts while we squabble and miss the point.

[-] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago

Divide and conquer is the way the right defeats the left in this country.

Put the minor conflicts aside and walk in lock step. A United front is the only way we can resist. 💪

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

Meanwhile I made the comment you're replying to, and yet I've been unnecessarily aggro elsewhere in this very thread, cuz damn is this tactic effective and requiring constant vigilance to counteract.

[-] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 2 points 15 hours ago

I think you and I used to fight. But with this statement I am on your side.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

As it's a class war, we're all on the same side, opposite the billionaires. We just need to recognize that simple fact.

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

Cheers, and I love that about this place. Thanks for making Lemmy worthwhile.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

It's a little bit boomers vs. millennials, based on the boomers and the millennials I have encountered

[-] 5318008@lemmy.ml -4 points 19 hours ago

... Let's unpack this.

  1. Person points out this is just another case of wealthy and powerful people stirring up trouble between two groups of people. This is easy because people are easy to trick. If the headline is to be believed, even AOC, who isn't stupid, believes boomers are the source of the problem.

  2. You point out that, based on the people you know, there's a conflict between boomers and millennials.

but... that's not proof that the source of the problem actually IS either group. It's still the case that this conflict is caused by a third group of people who have a vested interest in making sure the poors fight each other.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Okay yes let's unpack it, please

What percentage of "the people who have a vested interest in making sure the poor fight each other" do you think are boomers, and what percentage are millennials? And of those millennials, what percentage of them are acting on behalf of, and/or dependent on a mega powerful boomer?

And to be fair I said a little bit.

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

There are millennials in this US administration. The fuck are you talking about?

It's class. Not age.

Does "on behalf of a powerful boomer" include...ya know...having an inheritance from them and working in the family business?

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Okay dude, Millennials are no better than boomers, got it. Everyone is the same in every generation...only once you achieve $500k per year do you become hateful and evil

Money is the only thing that corrupts, and the evidence I see of younger people voting differently than older people, and younger people next to me in the protests means nothing. The kind loving boomer neighbors of mine are probably also in that crowd of protestors somewhere, I just missed every single one of them when I looked....

You're not wrong that it's rich vs poor first and foremost. But you're lying to yourself if you think boomers aren't actively harming younger generations, and that younger generations are totally fine with it.

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 10 hours ago

Cool, thanks for the utterly useless straw man reply where you reduce my own more nuanced take into this idiotic "oh okay so then it must be this cartoon version of what you said".

I'm not taking the side of boomers at all. They're uniquely deranged and damaging to us all, and have been that way for decades.

Take whatever you want from my POV, not a lot of point in discussing with you further.

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I mean all I literally tried to say was "it's a little bit millennials vs. boomers", which you seemed to take as a direct challenge, and had to "well acccccctually" argue against, for some reason. I actually never disagreed with your overall point, I only "straw manned" when it was clear you'd dug your heels in and weren't reading the actual point of my comments and needed everything in black and white. You really weren't presenting your argument with much wiggle room at all.

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 hours ago

Ya know, I wasn't reading your comments carefully, you're right. That's my bad, apologies.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

There are millennials in this US administration.

What pathetic percentage do they take up in your gerontocracy?

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I don't have the first clue how I'd determine something like that. Do you? I'm talking about the US Presidential administration.

Maybe you're talking about Congress + the actual presidents we always get? The elected officials themselves are all old as fuck.

Wonder how many of those congressional staffers are millennials? And the executive cabinet, etc., all the many many unelected creatures.

~~Your take is shallow and bad and betrays a poor understanding of our government and who actually does the "work" in it.~~


[Edit - I didn't say anything here I disagree with, but I'm bringing an unnecessary tone to discussions in this thread where I'm not even adequately reading the stuff I'm replying to, so apologies on the hostility at the end, I'ma chill out]

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Uhh, yeah. Look at how many senators and Congress people there are, then see how many of them are over the age of 50, then divide that number by the total and multiply by 100. Are you 12?

[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

What you evidently don't understand is every person you're describing has large teams of people working for them, and they are by and large ages where the brain still fires on all cylinders.

Our present gov is rife with millennials, you sound real uninformed or you're not thinking very hard about who actually does the nitty gritty in the government. The elected official is the tip of an iceberg, and there's a lotta icebergs.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 hours ago
[-] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

You seem unwilling to really make any claims, so, see ya I guess.

[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago

Bye polar karen

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
862 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30728 readers
3219 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS