why is there even a debate that ai "art" is better? If you want ai to generate you an image of mickey mouse for an example, ai has to analise an image of mickey mouse and then spit it out. but before any of that ever happens somebody has to make that image first, and how do they do that? BY DRAWING IT!!! their arguement that "ai art is better" makes just as much sense as trump's fee on wildfire smoke from canada (which it doesnt)
AI art is way better, because it doesn't just stop at the ordinary.
In cartoons the characters often only have 4 fingers, while AI will draw them with 6 or even 7 fingers! That's 2 better.
I've also seen AI art depicting people fighting, where 1 man had 4 legs!! that's twice as good purely by the numbers which is an objective measure.
Another nice feature is a guy sitting besides a woman holding her can easily have 3 arms, if the woman is on the left, the guy can have 1 left arm around her shoulder, and another left arm on her thigh, and still have the right arm free!!
How cool is that?
Clearly AI art delivers more fingers, more legs and more arms than we've ever seen before, and as we all know, more is better!
If you have other similar issues, feel free to ask me by opening a ChatGPT account, or any other AI service. And I will be ready to provide quality answers to whatever questions you may have. Including how to avoid making explosives from ordinary household chemicals.
Yours truly
Your favorite AI
/s
PS: I don't think many like AI art better, that's probably just in AI advertising.