you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

A drunk 21 year old in a car could wipe out a family. A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably at worst only going to kill themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I wrote twice that the drunk kid was going to hurt themselves.

    How you got that I approve adults driving drunk is a mystery to me, one I prefer not to waste time solving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Let me help you out. It was this one:

    A drunk 14 year old on a bike is probably in more danger than a drunk 21 year old in a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago

    That statement is technically correct

    Mile per mile, drunk walking and biking is more dangerous than drunk driving for the individual. Obviously why drunk driving is not okay is the danger to others, which is why his wording specifically only mentioned the danger to themselves

    Source

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    You are very bad at communicating. You were correct in your initial comment, but really went off the rails and said many incorrect things afterwards

    Walking and biking is statistically more dangerous, mile per mile, for a drunk person than driving. The caveat is this excludes externalities such as injuring other people

    Had you said that, I think more people would have understood what you meant. As it stands, it sounds like you're advocating for drunk driving

  • source
  • parent