▲ 896 ▼ Scientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming (www.sciencedaily.com) submitted 3 weeks ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world 369 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) i mean that curve is pretty clear. were the scientists they were talking to expecting a linear model? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) They weren't expecting a linear model. Did you read the article? The increase in acceleration is something theyve noticed since 2013, as reported in the article (of about .35 per year instead of .2). There was also an unusual increase in 2023 and 2024. These are all important things scientists should be measuring and reporting on, even if it seems obvious by random lemmy user looking at a graph (graph that was made by scientists measuring and reporting on their observations). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Did I read the article from science faily? No. I've read enough from that rag where they drew the opposite conclusion than both the data and author were saying, so why should I trust them to get this right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 point 3 weeks ago Then why not read the actual journal article published by the researchers? I'm not opposed to going direct to the source, but it seems awful silly of you to make assumptions about what the researchers think without first seeking any information whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) They weren't expecting a linear model. Did you read the article? The increase in acceleration is something theyve noticed since 2013, as reported in the article (of about .35 per year instead of .2). There was also an unusual increase in 2023 and 2024. These are all important things scientists should be measuring and reporting on, even if it seems obvious by random lemmy user looking at a graph (graph that was made by scientists measuring and reporting on their observations). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Did I read the article from science faily? No. I've read enough from that rag where they drew the opposite conclusion than both the data and author were saying, so why should I trust them to get this right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 point 3 weeks ago Then why not read the actual journal article published by the researchers? I'm not opposed to going direct to the source, but it seems awful silly of you to make assumptions about what the researchers think without first seeking any information whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child) Did I read the article from science faily? No. I've read enough from that rag where they drew the opposite conclusion than both the data and author were saying, so why should I trust them to get this right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 point 3 weeks ago Then why not read the actual journal article published by the researchers? I'm not opposed to going direct to the source, but it seems awful silly of you to make assumptions about what the researchers think without first seeking any information whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 1 point 3 weeks ago Then why not read the actual journal article published by the researchers? I'm not opposed to going direct to the source, but it seems awful silly of you to make assumptions about what the researchers think without first seeking any information whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent