you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

You're just meme-ing, right? Or how did you come to that conclusion? Because neither BGP nor physics works like that. The ping would be significantly worse, even in the hypothetical case of RU-CN laying a huge direct fiber cable from Moscow to Chengdu. The only exception would be those in the Far East (which is most likely already choosing routes through China), as the overwhelming majority of Russia lives in the western side.

But it's not even a cutoff, there's still many different routes through Europe that will be chosen. That's the beauty of the Internet, it will always get routed to its destination unless someone specifically blocks it :) And that's also why so much traffic goes over those lines, as it's the cheapest path; internet routing is behaving exactly as intended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The ping would be much lower for communications with Asia, once again the most important continent for Russia. All European nations are achieving by severing ties and communications with Russia is self-isolation.

    When you take your ball and go home, people stop caring about your game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Why are you moving the goalposts? You said that latency would be less, if traffic leaving RUnet were to go via China instead of via Finland... which is an objectively false statement.

    Even your new statement is illogical; traffic intended for Asia will already be routing in that direction instead of going into Europe first.

    I implore you to read up more on how Internet routing works, as it's actually very interesting stuff. And yes, as I said, this will have very little impact on Russians.

  • source
  • parent