You asked for an example with zero violence.

No I didnt. I was explaining to you why wikipedia's list isnt useful and why the individual stop looking into the instances on the list immediately after finding counter examples in literally the first couple instances listed.

I gave you that example. And you barely acknowledge it.

Because I didnt give a shit about your example because I knew what I'd find. but lets address it now to demonstrate the point I was making:

The June Democratic Struggle in South Korea was preceded by significant violence during earlier protests, notably the Gwangju Uprising in 1980, where the military brutally suppressed demonstrations, leading to widespread casualties. This history of violence contributed to the urgency and scale of the protests in June 1987, as citizens demanded democratic reforms and an end to authoritarian rule.

You can't say 'look this uprising succeeded without the use of violence!' when the reason it succeeded was arguably because of the use of violence that proceeded it. They're not independent events. Its the same regime, same population, within less than a generation, involving many of the same actors and part of an ongoing sequence of resistance.

My statement of there being very few examples of non-violent revolutions was a hedge because I'm not intimately familiar with the history of every civilization on the planet for all time. But every time this conversation has come up and people like yourself have cropped up I can't recall a single instance that was referenced as being violence free.

As people have literally done for you multiple times now, you're just fucking wrong.