-22
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by thunderousApplaus@sh.itjust.works to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

Thought it relevant to this community and posted it to have a discussion on this topic. I am not the author of this blog nor do I endorse the authors views.

Before leaving an upvote or a downvote (a function that IMO should be reserved to posts/comments that are offtopic, made in bad faith or low quality), please first read the blog post.

TL;DR: Author of the blog is criticising Codeberg outright banning LLM and crypto projects. Author thinks this approach is not nuanced enough and introduces censorship to the platform. Author therefore decided to selfhost his projects that the author previously had migrated to Codeberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Hmmh. Yeah, I'm writing this from the perspective of someone who likes to talk in the comments. So I generally appreciate to know whether OP wants to discuss a topic, inform people, post the news or whatever. That changes how I react to a post.

Also appreciate some lead text in the body, so I don't need to click on 200 links a day to find out what's behind the url or (clickbaity) title...

But that's usually not how it's done here. A lot of people just post the link and that's it. I guess in your instance it would have been helpful to disclose whether that's your perspective on things... Or whether you want to draw attention to someone's ignorant opinion... I suppose most of the downvotes are because people are confused (as always) and it's a mixture of just reading the title and disliking the content... Though... Similar posts about: OpenAI has this and that weird stance usually get upvotes here. So I suppose if you want to draw attention to someone having weird opinions, you should be getting upvotes as well?! I just think if it's backwards like this (the article fits fuck_ai because they're wrong), you might want to add a few words to make it clear people aren't supposed to sympathize with the text.

[-] thunderousApplaus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Thanks for the constructive feedback! I'll add the context ASAP.

But I don't want to tell people how to think. IMO people should form their own (educated) opinions. I know this community has a heavy bias and I respect that, but can't I just post new opinions so we can have a discussion around that (and maybe even change our opinions based on the outcome of the discussion)?

In my experience not everyone is knowledgeable about everything and an open and respectful (as opposed to hostile) discussion is the way to inform new opinions. Am mistaken in thinking my approach should be tolerated in this community?

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
-22 points (21.1% liked)

Fuck AI

7709 readers
1354 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS