80
submitted 6 days ago by plinky@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

The deal is expected to last 30 years and is also expected to involve U.S. firms in developing the program. The deal could allow for the building of a uranium enrichment facility in Saudi Arabia following a joint U.S.-Saudi study.

But the agreement is not expected to include the IAEA’s Additional Protocol, which would allow for more monitoring, inspections and verification, according to one of the people.

saudis will get bomb before iran lmayo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] plinky@hexbear.net 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

why would anyone invade saudis? would usa invade pisrael because they have nukes? they did learn that counterinsurgency works very well if you have government on your side

*like napkin math (10 mb per day at 60-20 profit is 400 million dollars per day, or around 140 billion in profits from oil per year, their defense budget is 80 billion, and that's not touching various shenanigans to finance failsons, they literally can't waste any more money at their master's house, or the difference is super marginal)

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 24 points 6 days ago

Habibi, the US just set fire to their soft power and lit up the entire middle east by sticking their dick in Iran’s beehive.

We’re at the end stage of empire, I am absolutely shocked Saudi’s sovereignty has been completely untouched. Their army is literally 2 Indians and a Pakistani child, what is the hold up here?

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

their local enemies are like bedouins against pipelines, they are fine with hiring 500 cracked colombians to massacre houthis and sending 20% of government spending to usa.

the purpose of softpower is to make people aspire to be your vassal, middle east got that on fucking lock (aside from shias, not that i think it's got a lot to do with religious sect (see azerbaijan), but rather iran/saudi influence prevalence).

[-] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 15 points 6 days ago

why would anyone invade saudis?

Oil and to destabilize the region

would usa invade pisrael because they have nukes?

Iran neither has nor wanted nukes, and Trump knew this and still chose to try and beat Iran; we wouldn't invade Saudi Arabia because we think they're trying to build nukes, but that's the story we'd run with

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 17 points 6 days ago

saudis sell oil to buy usa debt, finance latest fads and ngo complexes for journos and academics, and tactically deploying religious doctrines to the enemies of usa. in what way that could possibly be improved?

[-] demeritum@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 days ago

The Saudis are still aligned with Turkey and therefore on the future shitlist of Israhell.

Vassals that grow too big need to be cut down.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

news

24838 readers
585 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS