you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 73 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

Oh god, I'm going to have to be the Old Trans explaining why everyone else's guesses on this one are wrong, lmao.

Back In The Day, before prosthetic soft penises ('packers') were widely available and cheap, a common substitute was to take a condom and fill it with hair gel. I never did it, but it was a tip around the time I came out in the mid 00s (although by then it was already starting to fade out in favor of silicone packers used today, it was mostly an affordability thing at that point). These weren't for sex, it's just to have something in your pants during your normal day that's penis shaped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Ah, that makes far more sense than the T-gel explanation. Probably a more realistic feel than the balled up socks.

    Here’s an ad for a packer from the same issue of the magazine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Oof, yeah, $45 in the 90s (? E: yeah, just saw '97 on your OP!) was a nonstarter for a lot of trans men! Condoms and hair gel were way cheaper in the short term.

    Also Jesus Christ, I thought $40 for a binder now was highway robbery! $85?! That thing better be embroidered with gold.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why hair gel and not something like water?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Water is too liquid and flowy, that’s not how flesh acts. Hair gel isn’t 1:1 either, but it’s closer and readily available. It will also take slightly longer than water to make it look like you pissed yourself if the condom pops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment