28
r/trueanon comment section defending "AI"
(old.reddit.com)
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Ai really isn't my speciality so I don't think I can answer most of this.However I'll give what I know a shot.
Open-source AI models (or open-weight models as I think they're technically called) allow people to download the model’s trained parameters and run, modify and fine-tune it themselves rather than relying entirely on the developer’s platform. Many Chinese developers, including DeepSeek and Qwen, release model weights, code and technical papers, operating partly like open research labs, although not every Chinese model is open. By contrast most of the large western firms keep their leading models proprietary instead selling access through their platforms or API's.
As for the technical minutia of your second question I am unsure beyond the fact it's a lot of matrix maths.
Thank you very much for the explanations! I appreciate you!