240
‘Adversarial clothing’: are garments designed to confuse facial recognition systems about to go mainstream? (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.ca
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Fortunately gait biometrics are junk science anyway lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    As if that stops police from using it to target randos or prosecutors from using it in court. The executive branch REALLY loves its junk science.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    If anything, that re-enforces quick_snail's point that all these individualistic anti-surveillance tips and tricks are pointless.

    Even if you did succesfully change your gait and wear black and use a special phone and didn't attend the action they're accusing you of attending, they'll jiggle the random number generator until it says you're guilty (p<0.05).

    There is a point in a surveillance state where it makes more sense to [REDACTED] fascists in plain view rather than waste energy trying to do anything subversively. Either follow the CIA manual on malicious compliance or blow up a pipeline, no real middle ground.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •