you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean, yeah, that's why I'm asking. Since it's beneficial to have several pronouns based on a person's intrinsic characteristics, a genderless society would also end up with several - but the question is, what would they base these pronouns on? Their age? Their role in society? Their personality?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    There are some interesting comments about how other languages do it in other threads.

    Here's one more idea - is this person present or not during the conversation

    Edit to expand on the idea:
    We can have 3 pronouns

    • Person participates in the conversation
    • Person doesn't participate but is somehow involved with speakers and conversation (like talking about a friend, or a customer that bothered you at work)
    • Talking about someone in an abstract sense. Like when writing about a celebrity, or a biography, or describing someone's life (even if a friend)
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    At the very least in the number, English and its almost non existent verbal conjugations is awful in that regard. When someone says you I need quite some context to know if it is talking to me or to a group of people where I'm included, it is even worse with they.

  • source
  • parent