you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 62 points 3 months ago (20 children)

When I have vacation, I don’t want to be bothered with work related stuff either. I understand their want for a vacation, and they should not be blamed. The system that allows this chicanery is at fault here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    I don't want to be bothered while on vacation either, but if something happens at work that needs my specific attention someone will find me.

    For fuck's sakes we can't be taking server rooms more seriously than democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I’m sorry but you’re enabling this behavior. When I take an official holiday, I’m unavailable for work, simple as that. Work is a part of my life, not the definition of my life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    As per Wikipedia on the topic.

    As of July 1, 2019, the monthly salary is of €8,932.86, or just over €107,000 per year.[15] MEPs also receive a general expenditure allowance of €4,563 per month.[15]

    If I can be called in from vacation for €43k a year, these cunts can come in to vote for the fucking future of democracy for €107k.

    Is it right to interrupt vacations? No. Does it matter in this case? Also the fuck no. The thing happened! They weren't there! If they want better rights or whatever I guess they should fucking unionise or whatever. Sitting out on a vote of this magnitude is beyond reprehensible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I agree. I guess what I didn't say is that I do a bunch of work on the clock in order to ensure 99% of my responsibilities are covered. And then even the other 0.9% my coworkers can just deflect or work around.

    But if a situation arises that actually hurts people imo that is no longer a work issue but a humanity issue, and if my fellows can't handle it then I do want to be made aware.

    If this a regular occurrence then there needs to be some way to block or mitigate the damage, so that people can go on vacation and not worry they're coming back to a mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    When a server is down, they want to find you. When they want to pass a law which you will vote against, how hard do you think they're trying?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I don’t want to be bothered with work related stuff either. I understand their want for a vacation, and they should not be blamed

    Have you ever heard the phrase, "With great power comes great responsibility"? Yes, it's from some dumb capeshit, but it's true. If you want to be elected into a position of such power, then you're voluntarily signing up for the responsibility, including the responsibility to keep shit like this from happening when you go on vacation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Vacation is vacation. They have a right to a vacation just like I do. The system should have safeguards in place. I don’t want the elected to have a burnout, just in the same way that I don’t want to have a burnout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The total vote count required shouldn't change if someone's on vacation.

    If they can't vote remotely or by proxy, then the vote should either be delayed or extended, or anyone absent should be listed as not present or abstained. Either way the percentage of "yes" votes shouldn't be any different from if every seat was in attendance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments